ANDREW DAVID W.Y.

PAPERS / RESEARCH

From questions
to arguments.

From fairness and contribution to allocation, strategy and sustained cooperation. Explore arguments, methods and hypotheses awaiting empirical tests.

Explore all 5 papers

01 / FEATURED PAPER

Working paper · 2026-09

Why do people keep contributing after current compensation has been paid? This paper examines how trust links perceived fairness with sustained voluntary input.

Andrew David W.Y. · Grok (xAI)

Read featured paper Download · DOCX ↓

02 / CONTINUE READING

Follow the inquiry

All papers ↗
Working paperDOCX · ZH / EN

Stakeholder Capital Governance · Capital Ecosystem · Series 2

Value Distribution When Stakeholder Power and Strategic Contribution Diverge

Joint improvement projects often produce two facts at once. One party holds stronger bargaining power, exit threats, or veto rights over rules. The other has delivered more of the realized technical, cost-reducing, or coordinative contribution. When the ranking by power diverges from the ranking supported by contribution evidence, incremental surplus is easily allocated by power rather than by contribution. Stakeholder research has already compared power and strategic importance as predictors of value distribution and has found that strategic importance can outweigh power.[1] Supply-chain experiments show that fairness concerns block full extraction by the powerful party.[2] What remains unspecified is whether, once mismatch is present, verifiable contribution records and independent review can change allocation choices.

Andrew David W.Y. · Grok (xAI)

Read paper Download · DOCX ↓
Working paperDOCX · ZH / EN

Stakeholder Capital Governance · Operations & Management Ecosystem / Customer Ecosystem · Series 3

From Stakeholder Feedback to Strategic Action

Growing manufacturers rarely lack feedback channels. Employees can report a product-quality defect through teams, inspection, and internal systems; customers can report the same defect through complaints, returns, reviews, and after-sales files. Firms therefore accumulate remarks without being able to show which remark changed a standard, a budget, or a cross-functional process. Voice and issue-selling research explains why people speak and how middle managers place problems on agendas.[1][2] Quality-management work describes how complaints are classified. The remaining gap is how, for the same quality issue arriving from internal and external sources, evidential standing, organizational translation, agenda authority, and resource handover connect or break—and why channel volume does not guarantee conversion.

Andrew David W.Y. · Grok (xAI)

Read paper Download · DOCX ↓
Working paperDOCX · ZH / EN

Stakeholder Capital Governance · Resource Ecosystem · Series 4

Intertemporal Conflict and Willingness to Continue Stakeholder Cooperation

Joint improvement often asks a supplier to advance tooling, trials, and on-site costs and to share cost-reduction or volume gains only later. Delay raises waiting and exposure and can weaken willingness to continue. Buyers therefore offer compensation promises against present input. Williamson showed that specific investment needs credible commitment;[1] reciprocity and network studies show that long cooperation can organize knowledge sharing.[2][3] What remains is whether, when stated returns and risk notes are held comparable, the verifiability and enforceability of a promise can ease the damage of delay—and whether the supplier’s liquidity constraint swamps that easing.

Andrew David W.Y. · Grok (xAI)

Read paper Download · DOCX ↓

03 / RESEARCH TOPICS

Stakeholder Capital Governance ↗

5 papers

SEARCH