ANDREW DAVID W.Y.

PAPERS / INDEX

Find your research question.

Search by keyword, manuscript status, research topic and ecosystem. Every entry includes reading access and original files in Chinese and English.

5 papers

Paper results

Working paperDOCX · ZH / EN

Stakeholder Capital Governance · Operations & Management Ecosystem · Series 1

The Influence Mechanism of Stakeholder Fairness Perception on Voluntary Contribution Behavior

Sustained firm growth depends on employees and teams continuing to contribute knowledge, collaboration, innovation, and relationship maintenance beyond formal duties. Prior research shows that organizational justice predicts organizational citizenship behavior, yet most studies still treat employees primarily as internal subordinates. Fewer studies explain, from the standpoint of participants in a cooperative scheme, why people keep making hard-to-price voluntary contributions after current compensation has already been paid. This paper links Phillips’s principle of stakeholder fairness with the literatures on organizational justice, social exchange, and organizational trust, and proposes a mechanism of stakeholder fairness perception → trust → voluntary contribution behavior.

Andrew David W.Y. · Grok (xAI)

Read paper Download · DOCX ↓
Working paperDOCX · ZH / EN

Stakeholder Capital Governance · Capital Ecosystem · Series 2

Value Distribution When Stakeholder Power and Strategic Contribution Diverge

Joint improvement projects often produce two facts at once. One party holds stronger bargaining power, exit threats, or veto rights over rules. The other has delivered more of the realized technical, cost-reducing, or coordinative contribution. When the ranking by power diverges from the ranking supported by contribution evidence, incremental surplus is easily allocated by power rather than by contribution. Stakeholder research has already compared power and strategic importance as predictors of value distribution and has found that strategic importance can outweigh power.[1] Supply-chain experiments show that fairness concerns block full extraction by the powerful party.[2] What remains unspecified is whether, once mismatch is present, verifiable contribution records and independent review can change allocation choices.

Andrew David W.Y. · Grok (xAI)

Read paper Download · DOCX ↓
Working paperDOCX · ZH / EN

Stakeholder Capital Governance · Operations & Management Ecosystem / Customer Ecosystem · Series 3

From Stakeholder Feedback to Strategic Action

Growing manufacturers rarely lack feedback channels. Employees can report a product-quality defect through teams, inspection, and internal systems; customers can report the same defect through complaints, returns, reviews, and after-sales files. Firms therefore accumulate remarks without being able to show which remark changed a standard, a budget, or a cross-functional process. Voice and issue-selling research explains why people speak and how middle managers place problems on agendas.[1][2] Quality-management work describes how complaints are classified. The remaining gap is how, for the same quality issue arriving from internal and external sources, evidential standing, organizational translation, agenda authority, and resource handover connect or break—and why channel volume does not guarantee conversion.

Andrew David W.Y. · Grok (xAI)

Read paper Download · DOCX ↓
Working paperDOCX · ZH / EN

Stakeholder Capital Governance · Resource Ecosystem · Series 4

Intertemporal Conflict and Willingness to Continue Stakeholder Cooperation

Joint improvement often asks a supplier to advance tooling, trials, and on-site costs and to share cost-reduction or volume gains only later. Delay raises waiting and exposure and can weaken willingness to continue. Buyers therefore offer compensation promises against present input. Williamson showed that specific investment needs credible commitment;[1] reciprocity and network studies show that long cooperation can organize knowledge sharing.[2][3] What remains is whether, when stated returns and risk notes are held comparable, the verifiability and enforceability of a promise can ease the damage of delay—and whether the supplier’s liquidity constraint swamps that easing.

Andrew David W.Y. · Grok (xAI)

Read paper Download · DOCX ↓
SEARCH